James Bond's first on-screen appearance was on an episode of Climax!, a network mystery show in the 50's that bizarrely cast Bond as an American but on the plus side, has Peter Lorre as the villain. It's not enough though as this one just doesn't work.
Speaking of things that just don't work, our next entry is the remarkably awful '67 spoof that for far too long was the main thing people thought of when they heard "Casino Royale". Thankfully, that has been rectified. I helped slay this particular cinematic dragon a few years ago on The Agony Booth.
This gets the lowest ranking as far as 'official' entries in the series go since it takes what could have been a pretty damn good movie (James Bond vs. Christopher Lee) and fritters it all away on lame comedy, a jumbled script and a really stupid climax that sees 007 chasing Tattoo from Fantasy Island around a boat. Just terrible and the only Bond film I can honestly call a true bad movie.
The only reason this gets this ranking is sheer nostalgia as this is one of the first movies I ever saw more than once. In fact, based on the times my buddy threw it into the VCR from 1986 to about 1989, it's entirely possible I've seen it more times than the folks who made it. Having said that, the only real thing to watch here is Sean Connery who proves that he can deliver the goods even in a truncated production that, for legal reasons too complex for an article this long, could only be a copy of Thunderball.
This just barely misses the top 20 thanks to it really not being all that great after the first hour or so. It starts off great, though but by the time you get to the last half hour, you just want it to be over. Sad, really, as this was Connery's big return to the role after George Lazenby appeared in his one movie as 007. When it's good, it's very good but when it's bad...Ugh!
I've softened my stance on this quite a bit as even though it does have it's dumb moments and far too many humorous moments that fall flat, it's still a perfectly acceptable dumb summer action movie. Performances are fine, the action is plentiful and the John Barry score is typically great. I won't be linking t the piece I did on it for The Agony Booth because, to be brutally frank, it stinks like a rotting corpse.
Connery's fifth turn as 007 is marred by some serious pacing issues which take a reasonably entertaining spy film and drag it out to a rather patience-trying experience.
This one is a bit of a guilty pleasure for me as it's the first Bond film I ever saw. Roger Moore's swan song benefits from a good Christopher Walken performance, good stunts (especially the Eiffel Tower jump), great music and a heart stopping finale on the Golden Gate Bridge. Outside of that, it's another solid but not excellent entry in the series.
Moore's first outing as 007 takes its cue from Dr. No and gives us a more low key entry with a down to earth performance from Yaphet Kotto as the villain, Jane Seymour as the female lead and some fantastic action sequences in the last forty minutes. Unfortunately, it also has some rather lame comedic moments and may actually be too laid back for its own good. Solid action movie, though.
I have the first entry this low for the simple reason that while it is a very good movie, it is still the first real appearance of Bond and therefore can't be considered the best in my view. Still, it's one hell of a ride.
We have our first Pierce entry as his third outing as Bond took him on a more serious trip...while still trying to deliver the heavy duty action of the previous two. TWINE is not exactly a bad movie but it's hampered by a lukewarm script and a rather bad bit of miscasting as a result. I could buy Denise Richards as a nuclear scientist, really I could, if the script hadn't given her such awful dialogue.
That aside, it's a fairly middling entry in the series with some good action beats.
The most recent entry in the series has dropped quite a bit on this list. It's fine as a wall-to-wall action movie but it just doesn't have that Bondian feel. Daniel Craig is good, as are the other actors but there's more action than plot which is never a good thing regardless of your tastes.
Here's where it really starts to get good. Timothy Dalton's first as 007 and also the first Bond film I saw in the theater. This is a fantastic, fairly low key spy thriller with some great action, a clever script and some really good performances. Dalton does a fine job of playing Bond differently from Moore and the result is one of the best films in the series.
Brosnan outing is one I really, really love in spite of some silly bits here and there. It's a fun, non-stop thrill ride that only falters a bit in the finale.
George Lazenby's only outing as Bond is also one of the best in the series. Great action, good acting, and a decent script make for one hell of a movie.
Bond delves into the world of the other action movies of the period as he goes after drug dealer Robert Davi on a personal revenge mission after Davi mauls his friend with a shark. Dalton is superb, the action is great and it's a real nice change of pace from the usual formula these films rely on. Personal fave Cary Tagawa also has a small role.
As the teaser poster said, his bad side is a dangerous place to be.
Roger Moore followed up the somewhat underwhelming Moonraker with this very solid, more serious entry that still delivers the action goods. The plot is nicely complex, Moore is really good, especially in one or two moments where he comes off as quite dangerous, and that poster to the left is just awesome.
While I have Pierce's debut in Goldeneye ranked higher, this may be my favorite of his films as it's just a fun, over the top roller coaster of a movie. Michelle Yeoh is great, as is Jonathan Pryce and the only thing holding it back is the lack of a good henchman.
The poster says it all as Moore gives us his breakthrough Bond outing in this epic action movie that is just awesome. It's so damn good I actually can't think of anything to say about it. The only reason it isn't #1 is that there are six films even more awesome than this.
Bond goes Hitchcock as Connery's second outing provides us with a traditional espionage film...on steriods. Of the more "serious" 007 films, this is the best.
And now, the top 5.
The first Brosnan film and one I will always kick myself for not seeing in the theater. Just about everything in this one is perfect.
The template for the series, the only real problem I have with this one is the rather slow middle portion (though it;s still excellent).
Craig's debut gave the series a jolt of energy with this fantastic, smart thriller.
I love this one so frigging much. Great acting, a great script (apart from one or two small gripes) and great action make this almost the best in the series.
And finally, the number 1 entry:
It's actually a bit of a toss between the top two as it really depends on what sort of mood I'm in. Connery is at his best here, delivering an insanely cool performance. The action is superb (this is what puts it over Goldfinger) and the women are amazingly beautiful. If a Bond film can be considered perfect, this is about as close as it gets.
And that's the James Bond franchise. My rankings are purely subjective and are subject to change, depending on my mood. Honestly, only the bottom four entries can really be called bad as the series has generally been very consistent. Hopefully the new entry, Skyfall, will be just as good as the others. We'll find out this November.